THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WINNER AND LOSER OF PLAYER SILAT MATCHES IN SEA GAMES SINGAPORE 2015.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the proposed study to determine the
relationship between winning and losing of silat match in Sean Games Singapore
2015. Data were collected from the four matches of silat which is Day 6 for
Men’s Category Class A, Category Men’s Class E for Day 9, Semi-final for Category
Men’s Class E and the Semi-final Category Men’s Class H. The totals of 13
performance indicator were being selected as the variable in this study. Descriptive
and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. There are many different form and techniques in silat but focus is
concentrated on strikes, joint manipulation, throws and bladed weaponry. The results showed Malaysia had won in the
four matches that had being chosen and the motions of Malaysia used on the
match were higher than the opponent teams. A videos recording during the match were used
in this analysis. The fours matches were choose from the same category but
different Class which is different in weight criteria.
INTRODUCTION
Silat is a collective word for a class of indigenous
martial arts from a geo-cultural area of Southeast Asia encompassing most of
the Nusantara, the Indonesian Archipelago and the entirety of the Malay
Peningsula. Silat is the essence of the fighting and self-defense. Silat
can improve in self-defenses and it can be learned to use in competing a game
which is it involve exciting, fun, and motivating for athlete. It creates
involvement of the athletes in the class, larger excitement to improve and
study new advanced skills, and motivating the athletes or the student in
perform better in class.
The nature of work periods
within any combat sports depend on the frequency, volume and type of the
activity being performed. The distribution of fight time and break time has
been determined in international silat competition in the previous research, which
indicated that 62.6% of the match is spent in fight time. In addition, a single
match contains 30.0 mean action periods with on average 15.3 s being performed
with break periods averaging 8.4s. The work to rest ratio of 2:1 in silat might
be misinterpreted if people count the action periods performed in silat in the
same way as work periods in field games and rackets sports are interpreted.(Shapie,
Oliver, O’Donoghue, & Tong, 2013). The nature of “purposeful movement”
in team games rallies in racket sports and action periods in martial arts are
very different.
Performance indicator is
a type of performance measurement. Performance measurement is the process of
collecting, analyzing and reporting information regarding the performance of an
individual, group, organization, system or component.
MATERIAL
AND METHODS
Match analysis
For analyze, I
choose 4 match of silat in Sea Games Singapore 2015for Men’s Category. For
first match was came from category men’s
Class A (50kg) in Day 6, which is Arieffudin Ridzuan from Malaysia and
Teerapong Muntaen from Thailand. For second
match was from men’s category Class E (70kg) in day 9 between Mohd Al Jufferi
Jamari from Malaysia and Van Hoang Vu from Vietnam while the third match was
from semi-final men’s category Class E (70kg) between Mohd Al Jufferi Jamari
from Malaysia and Sheik Ferdous Sheik Alau’ddin from Singapore. For the Last match
from semi-final Men’s category Class H (85kg) between Muhammad robial Sobri
from Malaysia and Sheik Farhan Sheik Alau’ddin from Singapore.
Motion
categories
Silat exponent’s motions were coded into
14 different types of categories and were defined as follows:
Punch:
The punch ‘tumbuk’ attack is done
by a hand with a closed fist hitting the target. In silat punching is often
used to fight the opponent. It can be a straight punch ‘tumbuk lurus’ or
uppercut ‘sauk’ to the exponent body’s. (Shapie,et.all)
Kick:
The kick ‘tendang / terajang’ is an
attacking movement which is performed with one leg or two legs simultaneously. A
kick can be aimed at any target. It can be front kick ‘ tendang depan’,
side-kick ‘depak’ or semi-circular side kick ‘tendang lengkar’.
(Shapie,et.all)
Block:
The blocking movements begin with the
posture position ‘sikap pasang’: the exponent stands straight with his
hands around his body or close to his chest. Blocking or parrying ‘tangkisan’
can be done using arms, elbows and legs with the purpose to block off or striking
back at any attack. (Shapie,et.all)
Catch:
The catch ‘tangkapan’ is done by using the hand to obstruct the opponent
from carrying out an attack. The silat exponent is able to prevent himself from
being attacked by pointing the attack which he has caught to another direction.
A catch which twists or drags the opponent
is forbidden. Also, a catch which could break the part which is being held such
as the leg and waist is also forbidden. These regulations exist to protect the
silat exponent’s. (Shapie,et.all)
Topple:
There are various ways of toppling down
one’s opponent. For example, a silat exponent ‘pesilat’ can push, shove the opponent’s back leg from the bag or
from the side, shove, hit, kick, strike or punch to make the opponent lose his
balance. Every fall is considered valid as long as the silat exponent topples
his opponent down without wrestling or he is able to overpower the opponent
whom he has brought down. (Shapie,et.all)
Sweep:
Swiping ‘sapuan’ involves attacking an
opponent’s leg which is on the ground to unstabilize him and bring down to the
ground. A silat exponent can perform this attacking movement either with his
right or left leg, Hence, front sweep ‘sapuan
depan’ is done by swinging the
leg to the front to push an opponent’s front leg, while back sweep ‘sapuan belakang’ is carried out by
swinging the leg backward to hit the back leg. (Shapie,et.all)
Evade/Dodge:
The evade ‘elakan’ technique is
carried out by silat exponent when he tries to evade an attack. This technique
does not require the silat exponent to touch the opponent in fending off the
attack. They are many ways of carrying out his defensive movement such as
dodging ‘gelek’, retreat ‘mundur’, evasion to the side ‘elak
sisi’, bending ‘elak serung’, jumping ‘lonjak’, ducking ‘susup’
and etc. (Shapie,et.all)
Self-Release:
Self-release ‘lepas tangkapan’
technique is a technique to unlock any clinch or catch from an opponent. (Shapie,et.all)
Block and Punch:
The blocking technique is used to block
any hand or leg attack from the opponent and followed by counter attack using the
hand to punch the opponent.(Shapie,et.all)
Block and Kick:
The blocking technique is used to block
any hand or leg attack from the opponent and followed by counter attack using
the leg to kick the opponent. (Shapie,et.all)
Block and Sweep:
The blocking technique is used to block
any hand or leg attack from the opponent and followed by counter attack using
sweeping technique to the opponent. (Shapie,et.all)
Fake Punch:
An action which a silat exponent intends
to confuse the opponent using a fake punch to break his opponent’s defensive posture.
(Shapie,et.all)
Fake Kick:
An action which a silat exponent intends
to confuse the opponent using a fake kick to break his opponent defensive posture.
(Shapie,et.all)
Others:
Both silat exponents are either in posture
position ‘sikap pasang’ or coming close to each other using silat step
pattern ‘pola langkah’. All the activities are considered
high intensity except for others which at that time both silat exponents
are in low intensity periods. (Shapie,et.all)
STATISTICAL
ANALYSIS
All the raw data collected from all
matches. Used the system produced by Shapie at all by 2013. Statistical
analysis was conducted using SPS, version 22. A descriptive analysis was used
to determine the different of performance between winner and losses in silat
matches.
RESULTS
Table 1: Total Mean and Standard Deviation
for all four matches
EXPONENT
|
MEAN
|
STANDARD DEVIATION
|
RED
|
4.07
|
5.51
|
BLUE
|
3.79
|
4.73
|
Winner:
Malaysia (Red)
Table 2: Frequency of actions and outcomes recorded during a
silat match
ACTION
|
OUTCOME
|
|||
Hit Elsewhere
|
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Total
|
|
Block
|
0.38
|
1.88
|
0
|
2.26
|
Block and Punch
|
0.13
|
0.38
|
0
|
0.51
|
Block and Kick
|
0.13
|
0.5
|
0.13
|
0.76
|
Block and Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Catch
|
0.38
|
3.38
|
0.63
|
4.39
|
Evage / Dodge
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Punch
|
0
|
0.25
|
0.13
|
0.38
|
Fake Kick
|
0
|
1.25
|
1
|
2.25
|
Kick
|
4.25
|
12.38
|
3.63
|
20.26
|
Punch
|
1.13
|
5.13
|
1.25
|
7.51
|
Self- release
|
1.13
|
1
|
0
|
2.13
|
Sweep
|
0
|
3.38
|
3.25
|
6.63
|
Topple
|
0.25
|
3.63
|
2
|
5.88
|
Total
|
7.78
|
33.16
|
12.02
|
52.96
|
Loser:
Opponent (Blue)
Table 3: Frequency of actions and outcomes recorded during a
silat match
ACTION
|
OUTCOME
|
|||
Hit Elsewhere
|
Hit Target
|
Miss Opponent
|
Total
|
|
Block
|
0
|
5.13
|
0.13
|
5.26
|
Block and Punch
|
0.13
|
1.13
|
0
|
1.26
|
Block and Kick
|
0
|
0.63
|
0
|
0.63
|
Block and Sweep
|
0
|
0.13
|
0.38
|
0.51
|
Catch
|
0.25
|
2.38
|
1
|
3.63
|
Evage / Dodge
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Punch
|
0
|
0.75
|
0.25
|
1
|
Fake Kick
|
0.38
|
1.88
|
0.63
|
2.89
|
Kick
|
6.25
|
8.25
|
3.38
|
17.88
|
Punch
|
1.5
|
5
|
0.75
|
7.25
|
Self- release
|
0
|
1.5
|
0
|
1.5
|
Sweep
|
0.13
|
0.25
|
2.88
|
3.26
|
Topple
|
0.5
|
1.63
|
2.13
|
4.26
|
Total
|
9.14
|
28.66
|
11.53
|
49.33
|
Table 4: Frequency profile of the 2 contestants
Exponent
|
Block
|
Kick
|
Punch
|
Topple
|
Total
|
Red
|
2.26
|
20.26
|
7.51
|
5.88
|
35.91
|
Blue
|
5.26
|
17.88
|
7.25
|
4.26
|
34.65
|
Total
|
7.52
|
38.14
|
14.76
|
10.14
|
70.56
|
DISCUSSION
According to the result
for this competition, for the first match, between Arieffudin Ridzuan from
Malaysia and Teerapong Muntaen from Thailand in category Men’s 50kg Class A in
day 6, Arieffudin Ridzuan from Malaysia won this game 3:2. For the second
match, Mohd Al Jufferi Jamari from
Malaysia also won 4:1 in day 9 against
the player from Vietnam which is Van Hoang Vu in Class E Men’s 70kg while for
the third match was during semi-final men’s category Class E 70 kg is between Mohd
Al Jufferi Jamari and Sheik Ferdous Sheik Alau’ddin from Singapore, and the winner is from
Malaysia which is the score 5:0. Lastly in category Men’s 85kg Class H in final
between Muhammad Robial Sobri from Malaysia, Tri Juanda Samsul Bahar and Sheik
Farhan Sheik Alau’ddin was won this gamein score 5:0.
For the first match, ,
between Arieffudin Ridzuan from Malaysia and Teerapong Muntaen from Thailand in
category Men’s 50kg Class A in day 6, Arieffudin Ridzuan from Malaysia which is in Red corner was won this game 3:2.
This is because the player from Red corner is using more kick than the
opponent, he also use more punch and sweep to against his opponent. The player
from Red corner was using more attacking than player from Blue corner. Both
teams have well in strength and fitness.
For the second match, Mohd
Al Jufferi Jamari from Red corner also won 4:1 was against the player from Vietnam
which is from Blue corner was Van Hoang Vu in Class E Men’s 70kg. This is
because the player from Red corner used more sweeps and topples than the Blue
corner. But Blue corner was more attacking the opponent by using more kicking
but the kicking were not accurate. Red corner player had a really good agility
and reaction time.
For the third match is
during semi-final men’s category Class E 70kg between Red corner which is player Mohd Al
Jufferi Jamari from Malaysia and Blue corner player from Singapore there is
Sheik Ferdous Sheik Alau’ddin, and Red corner player is winning this game 5:0.
This is because player from Red corner use more punch and sweep than the
opponent from Blue corner. Player from Red corner is more defending and
attacking than the Blue corner player. The player from Blue corner have low
level of fitness, have low reaction time, speed and not aggressive like player
from Red corner.
Lastly in category Men’s
85kg Class H in semi-final between Muhammad Robial Sobri from Malaysia and
Sheik Farhan Sheik Alau’ddin from Singapore, Muhammad Robial Sobri which is
from Red corner won this game 5:0. This is because player from Red corner is
use more attacking and he try to topple down the opponent in many times while
Blue corner more defend and attack but the attacking were not to accurate. The
player from Red corner have good in fitness level and strength because when the
Blue corner try to attack the Red corner but the player from Red corner not
fall down which is more to miss opponent action. The player from Red corner also has well in
reaction time and agility.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we know that the player from
Malaysian is the winner of the entire four matches. Player from Malaysia had a
good reaction time and good in fitness performance. They can complete the
techniques perfectly in used of attacking or defending such as kick, punch,
sweep and topple. Although the result may vary due to total
number of score given, this can be improved to the specific training especially
in kicking and punch to improve the chance of scoring. Malaysia teams also had
advantages in making the opponent erroneous with them because they always try
to take more attention from the opponent when starting to attack. Every team is
prefer to more attack than defend, this finding provide important information
for coaches developing their defense’s mechanism and also their offense
strategies. The loser cannot win this match because he often loses the
opportunity to kick, punch, sweep or topple because he cannot apply the
technique when he try attacking the opponent. In addition, based on the video,
the winner used block, kick, and sweep technique to fight back as well as
topple down the loser.
RECOMMENDATION
In
my opinion, the team from Malaysia should be more focus when do the attacking
on fight with opponent. The coach should recognize the ability and capability
of the National silat player and accepted, they trained so in the future they
are more athletes just like Al Jufferi Jamari although some the athlete cannot
perform doesn’t mean they should give up because they need to rise up and fight
for the country. is
recommended that those developing conditioning elements of training programs
for silat athletes are aware of the frequency and spread of durations of action
and rest periods within action periods. As we know some of the athletes is lack in using the
block and punch they always go for the sweep or topple, we must train longer to
improve the technique and the most important thing is the strength of the
athlete so they cannot easily sweep or topple. Furthermore, video analysis can
be a guidance to identify the athlete’s mistake also the strengths of the
athlete so in the future can improved more.
REFERENCES
1. JOURNAL
i.
Anuar
AW. Teknik dalam seni silat melayu [In Malay] (Technique in Silat Melayu).
Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka; 1992.
ii.
Anuar, A. W. (1993). Silat Olahraga (2nd edn.).
The art, technique and regulations.
iii.
Thomas
JR, Nelson JK. Research methods in physical activity. 4th ed. Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics; 2001.
iv.
Upadhaya, B., Munir, R., & Blount, Y.
(2014). Association between Performance Measurement Systems and Organisational
Effectiveness. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,
34(7), 2-2.
v.
Shapie, M. M., Oliver, J., O’Donoghue, P.,
& Tong, R. (2013). Activity profile during action time in national silat
competition. Journal of Combat
Sports and Martial Arts., 1(2),
81-86.
vi.
Parnabas, V., Shapie, M. N. M., & Parnabas,
J. (2015). Level of Drugs Usage and Sport Performance in Malay Silat. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal
of Martial Arts Anthropology, 15(2),
45-51.
vii.
Shapie, M. N. M. (2011). Influence of Age and Maturation on
Fitness Development, Trainability And Competitive Performance In Youth Silat (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff
Metropolitan University).
2. INTERNET
a. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eruVei7Pdg
b. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGK1CSVk0qs
d. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuT-n5UpMjE
g.
https://martial-arts-self-defense.knoji.com/silat-olahraga-the-malay-martial-arts-of-selfdefense/
h. malayfightingarts.blogspot.my/2008/07/silat-olahraga.html?m=1
Comments
Post a Comment